New Grid Research · The Pilot-to-Production Gap

43% of health systems piloting AI aren't buying it.

We surveyed IT and security leaders at 29 U.S. Epic health systems and interviewed 36 health-system AI buyers about why their AI pilots don't turn into purchases.

In the report
  • Piloting vs. buying across 29 Epic health systems, by system size
  • The five reasons pilots stall, with the numbers for each
  • 10 practices leaders use to scale a pilot or end it cleanly

For CMIOs, CAIOs, CIOs, CISOs and AI governance leads · 27 pages

Get the white paper
PDF, 27 pages. We'll email it to you.
Key findings
72%

of health systems are running or planning AI pilots.

Grid Survey
19%

of piloting systems are testing anything that informs a clinical decision.

4 of 21 piloting systems
1 of 12

ambient documentation pilots is described as finished.

Grid survey
19 of 36

AI buyers have no way to monitor how their AI performs.

Grid conversations
Part 1 of the report

At one large system, about 1 in 5 pilots reached full scale.

65
AI solutions reviewed
→
~25
reached a pilot
→
5–6
went organization-wide
Former Chief AI Officer, large multi-hospital system
Part 2 of the report

Five reasons pilots stall

01

No one owns the decision. 13 of 30 organizations raised unclear AI ownership without being asked.

02

Review can't keep up. One use-case review took 6 to 10 weeks. Reviewing one EHR vendor's catalog of 64 tools would take about four years.

03

Nobody budgets for scale. Vendors pay for the pilot. The health system pays for the rollout, and only 1 of 36 buyers has a budget for managing AI.

04

No one can see how the AI performs. 19 of 36 buyers can't monitor AI performance, and 10 of 30 organizations say vendors withhold performance data.

05

Every graduation is a custom integration. 20 of 29 systems run two or more data warehouses.

Part 3 lists 10 practices health-system leaders described to us. Two examples.

  • Agree on success before the pilot starts, and confirm the data to measure it will be there.
  • Tell the sponsor the full cost at scale before the pilot begins.
Get all 10 practices
What leaders told us

"My job description doesn't have AI governance in it. There's no one in our institution that really has that kind of title or ownership."

AI council chair, large academic IDN

"Everybody says you have to monitor AI programs, but nobody really does know how."

AI governance lead, large public multi-hospital system

Asked how accurate its ambient listening was, a vendor answered: "Yeah, no, go pound sand."

AI governance lead, multi-site provider
About the research

Grid surveyed IT and security leaders at 29 U.S. Epic health systems (22 with 1,000+ beds, 7 under 1,000) and held recorded conversations with 36 health-system AI buyers. Interview figures are each leader's account of their own organization and are labeled that way in the report. Leaders are identified by role and organization type only. Published November 2026.

Contents · 27 pages
  • Key findings and methodology
  • Part 1. Identifying the gap
  • Part 2. Why the gap exists
  • Part 3. Closing the gap: 10 practices
  • Conclusion

Read the full paper

It has the data behind each root cause and all 10 practices.

Send me the report

Grid Advisory helps health systems set up AI ownership, review and pilot criteria. See Professional Advisory